KlimaDAO KIP-3 Reward Rate Rationale
The effective management of KlimaDAO reward rates is critical to ensure the long-term growth and prosperity of the protocol. If KIP-3 passes, it will see KlimaDAO’s APY reward rate reduce.
Tl;dr: Reducing APY rewards allows KlimaDAO to improve the health and sustainability of the protocol by increasing the Risk Free Value (RFV) of BCT in the treasury. It also increases the DAO’s runway, meaning stakers will be able to enjoy rebasing rewards for a longer period of time. A healthier protocol instills confidence in market participants to continue bonding and staking for the long-term.
This article gives market participants a deeper insight into the tools available for KlimaDAO’s policy team, the analysis that has gone into the development of KIP-3, and how adjusting available mechanisms (in this case, reducing APY) can enable KlimaDAO to fulfil its long-term objectives.
The Big Picture
KlimaDAO has launched the world’s first decentralized carbon-backed currency. By using carbon assets as its backing, the protocol will increase the demand and utility of the underlying BCT and any future tokens that are accepted into its treasury. This development will incentivise the development of more carbon projects, incentivise organisations to invest in carbon reduction and mitigation, and will grow this new, regenerative economy on Web3.
The underlying mechanic of KlimaDAO is that in order to mint 1 KLIMA, at least 1 BCT must be locked in the treasury. KLIMA therefore has an intrinsic value and theoretical floor price equivalent to 1 BCT. If KLIMA trades below its intrinsic value (i.e. 1 BCT) then the treasury will use its BCT to purchase KLIMA to achieve the floor. However, there is no ceiling on KLIMA.
There are revenue generation opportunities for KlimaDAO in times of growth, and contraction:
- In periods of growth, if the protocol sells 1 KLIMA for 100 BCT, since 1 BCT is needed to mint, it makes a profit of 99 BCT.
- In periods of contraction (when KLIMA trades below BCT), if the protocol buys back 1 KLIMA for 0.5 BCT. As it costs 1 BCT to back 1 KLIMA, and it has spent 0.5 BCT to get 1 KLIMA, it saves (or makes a profit) of 0.5 BCT.
These examples demonstrate that each market action enables the treasury to secure more BCT and increase the intrinsic value of KLIMA. During times of growth (i.e. example 1, above), this is primarily achieved through bonds where a user can buy KLIMA at a market discount in exchange for BCT, BCT/USDC, or KLIMA/BCT.
Staking Rewards Explained
With the profits that the DAO makes from the arbitrage in the examples above, the protocol is free to reinvest through as it sees fit. During the expansionary phase, where the protocol is focused on revenue generation and treasury growth, the profits are used to mint more KLIMA to be distributed to stakers as sKLIMA. This redistribution of profits is key, as it gives the DAO the ability to expand and function as a useful, inflationary currency.
Additionally, distributing sKLIMA through a transparent and aggressive emissions schedule over a predetermined period of time is useful for the DAO as it significantly reduces the sell pressure and encourages (3, 3). The emission schedule is deferred over a long period of time, as giving all the rewards in one instance would decrease the premium of KLIMA significantly, reduce the arbitrage opportunity for the DAO, and increase short-term sell pressure.
Currently, the protocol can fuel the existing sKLIMA rewards because of the high premiums on KLIMA; currently at around 200 BCT (view here). Furthermore, the high APY is a prudent policy at this time in order to bring new market participants into the DAO. However, as time goes on the need to keep the high APY decreases as more assets are acquired into the treasury, and confidence in the protocol goes up. Bitcoin is a case in point of how increasing confidence should be inversely proportional to rewards. Bitcoin has the highest market cap of all cryptocurrencies, the most adoption and the greatest confidence, yet it has halved its per-block mining rewards roughly every 4 years (50; 25; 12.5; 6.25, and so on).
In the case of KLIMA, the protocol bears the burden of the APY, because it must generate revenues to deliver the rewards on offer. The below table demonstrates the amount of KLIMA minted for rewards every 8 hours within its current parameters (a reward rate of 0.5%, and a 5-day ROI of 8.5%).
Explicitly speaking, KlimaDAO currently needs ~2950 BCT of revenue per epoch to back each KLIMA. This increases exponentially every epoch (note, each epoch is 8 hours for KlimaDAO). To retain this value creation rate (of 5 BCTs/newly minted KLIMA), the DAO requires ~44k BCT in revenue per day right now, and it will only increase (see below).
Because of the positive growth experienced since launch in October this has been more than achievable for the DAO, and currently for every KLIMA minted there are 5 BCTs secured in the treasury. At the moment, the backing of each KLIMA is much higher than 1 BCT.
The stable or increasing backing of KLIMA by BCT that we have seen to-date (pictured below) adds stability and confidence to the protocol. This is ideal at this time given the protocol is still early stage.
On the other hand, a decline in the BCT backing of KLIMA could become a risk to the confidence in the protocol if it is not managed effectively.
The high APY rate currently on offer can make it harder to consistently retain this value because there is a trade-off between BCT backing existing KLIMA, and BCT being used to mint new KLIMA and cover the staking rewards (sKLIMA).
One tool available for the policy team that can be used to mitigate against this risk is to increase the revenue secured by the DAO by increasing the capacity of bonds. The issue with tweaking bonds however, is that it can dilute stakers’ market share of the protocol. For instance, if over a 6-month period a stakers’ token balance increased by 6x but the total supply increased by 12x, the actual balance would be worth 50% less in terms of market share.
Ultimately, staking is designed to retain a holder’s % share, even at times of high reward rates. Poor policy decisions that leads to too many bonds being issued can compromise the incentive to remain staked.
It is imperative for the KlimaDAO’s policy team to manage this delicate balance between optimizing revenue, and staker dilution. KIP-3 seeks to fine-tune this balance.
KIP — 3: Good Policy Design
By marginally decreasing the reward rate through KIP-3 (pictured below), KlimaDAO can adjust its risk and moderate the daily revenue required to both retain the healthy growth that has been seen since launch and still issue attractive rewards.
Below is a graph showing Daily revenue required (in BCT) to sustain our current 5 BCT per KLIMA RFV.
The saved revenues from reducing the APY will be used to back KLIMA with more BCT and accelerate the virtuous cycle of growth.
In addition to this, there are other beneficial effects in reducing the reward rate at this point:
- Reducing the reward rate decreases the overall emissions of the protocol (and the rate of inflation), ensuring each KLIMA retains its value for much longer. This makes it more attractive for other protocols to integrate with KlimaDAO as a long-term partner and lay the foundations for the on-chain carbon economy.
- Reducing the reward rate decreases the selling pressure from stakers, as high reward rates can make holders feel more inclined to sell their staked rewards into the market.
Finally, a point of clarity as there are some misconceptions around the concept of APY. The decrease in APY essentially impacts a staker if they only stake for 1 year. However, for long-term holders, the reduction in APY builds out the capacity for long-term growth of the protocol, and means that their rewards will compound further into the future.
Ultimately, tapering staking rewards today is less about short-term reward opportunities, and is more about growing the long-term incentive for Klimates to stick around (3, 3).
If you are an existing Klimate, please sign up for voting on our Snapshot to participate in KIP-3: https://snapshot.org/#/klimadao.eth
Follow Krian on Twitter, the lead author of this article.
The information provided in this Medium Post pertaining to Klima DAO (“Klima DAO”), its crypto-assets, business assets, strategy, and operations, is for general informational purposes only and is not a formal offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities, options, futures, or other derivatives related to securities in any jurisdiction and its content is not prescribed by securities laws. Information contained in this Medium Post should not be relied upon as advice to buy or sell or old such securities or as an offer to sell such securities. This Medium Post does not take into account nor does it provide any tax, legal or investment advice or opinion regarding the specific investment objectives or financial situation of any person. Klima DAO and its agents, advisors, directors, officers, employees and shareholders make no representation or warranties, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy of such information and Klima DAO expressly disclaims any and all liability that may be based on such information or errors or omissions thereof. Klima DAO reserves the right to amend or replace the information contained herein, in part or entirely, at any time, and undertakes no obligation to provide the recipient with access to the amended information or to notify the recipient thereof. The information contained in this Medium Post supersedes any prior Medium Post or conversation concerning the same, similar or related information. Any information, representations or statements not contained herein shall not be relied upon for any purpose. Neither Klima DAO nor any of its representatives shall have any liability whatsoever, under contract, tort, trust or otherwise, to you or any person resulting from the use of the information in this Medium Post by you or any of your representatives or for omissions from the information in this Medium Post. Additionally, the Company undertakes no obligation to comment on the expectations of, or statements made by, third parties in respect of the matters discussed in this Medium Post.